Pregnancies are expensive to health insurance companies,
especially pregnancies having low vitamin D
Propose increasing vitamin D levels and use a portion of the insurance company savings to reward the mother for having reduced medical costs of pregnancy and birth
Costs and net savings to insurance company
- $ 400 rebate/reward given to women for achieving > 40ng level of vitamin D while pregnant
Note: most of the reasons for poor response to vitamin D will be covered in the brochure - $ 600 estimated costs includes: vitamin D tests, vitamin D, Omega-3, education, analysis, management, etc.
- $ 4,000 estimated savings of per pregnancy & birth versus having low vitamin D
high risk for low Vitamin D, dark skin, high BM, high latitude, stay indoors a lot, excessive clothing, night shift,
have a disease associated with low vitamin D such as: MS, some cancers, diabetes, depression - $ 3,000 net savings (profit) for health insurance company (such as Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield)
Why it will work
Vitamin D reduces medical costs of pregnancy with low vitamin D by average of $4,000
- 97 % of pregnancies have < 40 ng of Vitamin D (high risk: dark skin, obese, etc)
- Intervention trials in hospitals, adding vitamin D have proven $2,570 savings average by reducing preterm births
- 440+ studies of Vitamin D and pregnancy at Vitamin D Life.com
Vitamin D helps with much more than pregnancy
- Less Vitamin D = big recent increases in 30+ health problems
- Vitamin D proven to treat/prevent 78 health problems
Incentives are proven to increase healthy behavior
- Smoking decreased 2.6 times when economic incentives were given
- Economic interventions to improve health – review 2016
8 wins, no losses for this proposal
1) Insurance company increases profit
2) Mother becomes healthier - less time off from work, both before and after birth
3) Mother might have less-than-maximum annual deductibles
4) Mother gets a rebate on her health insurance
5) Infant is healthier (leave hospital sooner, far lower medical costs)
6) Insurance Co. increases # of customers as people become aware of increased health, rebates
7) Hospitals get a reduction in malpractice costs.
8) Pregnancy doctors will be less overworked
Reward is based on number of pregnancy days achieving > 40ng of vitamin D
Give a reward/rebate of $2 for every day pregnant with > 40 nanogram of vitamin D (assuming a 39 week pregnancy)
- $ 476 If loading dose 1 month after becoming pregnant (34weeks x 7 x $2)
- $ 346 if maintenance dose 1 month after pregnant ( 26weeks x 7 x $2)
Additional documented profits to Health Insurance from added Vitamin D
- Reduces Miscarriage 2.5 times (not much cost savings, but mother is much happier)
- Reduces Pre-eclampsia 2 times
- Reduces Gestational Diabetes 2 times RCT
- Reduces Vaginosis 5 times RCT'
- Reduces C-section - unplanned by 1.6 times (C-section adds $20,000 cost to a pregnancy)
Probable sequence from the woman's point of view
- After her first prenancy visit her Insurance Company says it will pay her up to $476
if she has low vitamin D and she supplements while pregnant - Woman requests that rebate details be sent to her (email or mail, English or Spanish)
- Woman tells insurance company that she is interested in healthy pregnancy and signs up
- Woman requests free Vitamin D test via Health Insurance company (Amazon fulfillment)
- Woman places one drop of her blood onto test paper and mails it in
- Woman receives brochure describing how much vitamin D, Omega-3 to supplement
- Woman gets test results one week after maling it in (via email or mail)
- Woman can then:
Read the previously recieved brochure
Discuss the brochure on the phone
Talk with her doctor - Some women go ahead with supplementation (anticipate 50% will do so)
- Woman requests free Vitamin D and Omega-3 supplements for a healthier pregnancy
Via Insurance company with Amazon delivery to her home
Package includes a second home Vitamin D test
Package includes a $25 thank-you gift certificate as an immediate reward - Woman starts supplements and takes second test 10 or 80 days later
quick loading dose vs maintenance dose - Second vitamin D test results are sent both to her and her health insurance company
expected to show > 90% of the women will have achieved an optimal level of vitamin D
if among the 10% with low response she can try other form of vitamin D (gut) , Magnesium, stop smoking (which reduces Vitamin D by 9 mg) - Rebate check of $346 to $546 is sent to her – perhaps immediately after good test results
Future areas where vitamin D supplementation should be cost effective
Include pregnancies which are not at high risk of being vitamin D deficient (many whites, etc)
Higher reward if their achieved vitamin D level is > 50 nanograms
Cost savings go to large employers (>90% are self-insured)
See also Cost savings with Vitamin D which include the following
- Vitamin D once during pregnancy reduced infant health care costs (300 times ROI) – RCT Dec 2015
- 18 fewer hospital days if given 500,000 IU of vitamin D while ventilated in ICU – RCT June 2016 RCT
- Costs of Pregnancy much reduced by Vitamin D
- Increasing the vitamin D level of all Canadians to 40 ng would save 6 to 18 billion dollars a year – Nov 2016
- Omega-3 supplementation during pregnancy reduce early pre-term births (save 1500 USD per child) – Aug 2016
- Heart Attack ICU costs reduced $37,000 per person by $5 of Vitamin D
- Preterm births are VERY costly – Feb 2017
includes cost-effectiveness estimates for Vitamin D, Omega-3,Vitamin D and Iodine
Short URL for this page = is.gd/PregVitD2017