I doubt the reliability of this analysis. To say that there is an elevated risk above 40ng/ml from the first graph is nonesense and that it is is equivalent to a deficiency level of 12ng/ml is clearly false. The data of the second graph has not clearly separated out those who were severely ill and taking high doses of supplemental vitamin D2(3). I suspect many of these patients were taking large doses of vitamin D. This biase the results.
So I do not accept that higher serum levels increase risk.
“One pill every two weeks fights diabetes, cancers, heart failure, and 18 other diseases.”
To say that there is an elevated risk above 40ng/ml from the first graph is nonesense and that it is is equivalent to a deficiency level of 12ng/ml is clearly false.
The data of the second graph has not clearly separated out those who were severely ill and taking high doses of supplemental vitamin D2(3). I suspect many of these patients were taking large doses of vitamin D. This biase the results.
So I do not accept that higher serum levels increase risk.