There is so much important information missing from this report.
Firstly, what was the profile of those found to have "VDI" ie over 150ng/ml. How many were taking supplements of vitaminD (I assume all of them) along with calcium. Most people who take vitamin D also take calcium. If they are taking a lot of vitamin D then they would also be taking a lot of calcium. The symptoms described of VDI are those of hypercalcaemia. It would also have been useful to know why people were taking the vitamin D. In addtion people with hypercalcaemia nearly always have hypomagnesemia.
Secondly, the assumption in the analysis is based on vitamin D without its co-factors: magnesium, vitamin K2's, zinc and boron. If they are suggesting a maximum blood level and proposing a treatment for VDI then I would expect some discussion of the role of these co-factors.
It sounds like people are just left with no vitamin D after treatment for "VDI"
“One pill every two weeks fights diabetes, cancers, heart failure, and 18 other diseases.”
Firstly, what was the profile of those found to have "VDI" ie over 150ng/ml. How many were taking supplements of vitaminD (I assume all of them) along with calcium. Most people who take vitamin D also take calcium. If they are taking a lot of vitamin D then they would also be taking a lot of calcium. The symptoms described of VDI are those of hypercalcaemia.
It would also have been useful to know why people were taking the vitamin D. In addtion people with hypercalcaemia nearly always have hypomagnesemia.
Secondly, the assumption in the analysis is based on vitamin D without its co-factors: magnesium, vitamin K2's, zinc and boron. If they are suggesting a maximum blood level and proposing a treatment for VDI then I would expect some discussion of the role of these co-factors.
It sounds like people are just left with no vitamin D after treatment for "VDI"