Depression treated by Omega-3 (again) β meta-analysis
Efficacy of omega-3 PUFAs in depression: A meta-analysis
Translational Psychiatryvolume 9, Article number: 190 (2019)
Yuhua Liao, Bo Xie, Huimin Zhang, Qian He, Lan Guo, M. Subramaniapillai, Beifang Fan, Ciyong Lu & R. S. Mclntyer
π Download the PDF from Vitamin D Life
Forest plot for Omega-2 (PDF does NOT have forest plot for EPA)

We conducted this meta-analysis of double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials to estimate the efficacy of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), especially docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), in the improvement of depression. We applied a systematic bibliographic search in PubMed and EMBASE for articles published prior to 20 December 2017. This meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and R 3.4.3, and means and standard deviations were calculated in fixed- or random-effects models based on the results of the Q-test. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted to evaluate the stability of the results, and publication bias was evaluated by a funnel plot and Eggerβs linear regression analysis.
Our search resulted in 180 articles; we analyzed 26 studies, which included 2160 participants.
The meta-analysis showed an overall beneficial effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on depression symptoms (SMDβ=β β0.28 , Pβ=β0.004).
Compared with placebo, EPA -pure (=100% EPA) and EPA-major formulations (β₯60% EPA) demonstrated clinical benefits with an EPA dosage β€1βg/d (SMDβ=ββ0.50, Pβ=β0.003, and SMDβ=β β1.03 , Pβ=β0.03, respectively), whereas DHA-pure and DHA-major formulations did not exhibit such benefits.
Current evidence supports the finding that omega-3 PUFAs with EPAββ₯β60% at a dosage of β€1βg/d would have beneficial effects on depression. Further studies are warranted to examine supplementation with omega-3 PUFAs for specific subgroups of subjects with inflammation, severity of depression, and the dose response for both EPA and DHA supplementation.